Is My Geolocation API Drunk Again? Facing Bizarre Proxy-Related IP Location Issues

Author
Amit Sharma Author
|
3 weeks ago Asked
|
84 Views
|
2 Replies
0

hey folks, following up on my previous post about my IP geolocation being a bit wonky. itโ€™s still acting like a drunk GPS, but i've narrowed down the suspect.

  • The Lingering Problem: My geolocation API is still showing users in completely bizarre locations, often data centers or known VPN/proxy hubs, not their actual residential areas. it's really messing up my analytics and targeting.
  • My Suspicions: i'm heavily leaning towards VPNs and proxies messing with the location data. it's like my tool can't tell a real user from a server farm, even when i try some basic VPN detection methods.
  • What I've Tried (and Failed At):
    • switched geolocation API providers (MaxMind, IPinfo, etc.) - same issue.
    • implemented some basic IP blacklist checks, but it's like whack-a-mole.
    • tried to flag IPs known for cloud hosting, but it's not catching everything, and i'm getting false positives too.
  • The Evidence (Dummy Log): i'm seeing IPs like this in my logs, which I know are not residential, yet the API gives them a random country:
    [2023-10-26 10:30:15] INFO: User IP: 104.28.249.123
    [2023-10-26 10:30:15] INFO: Geolocation API Response: {"ip":"104.28.249.123","country_code":"PL","country_name":"Poland","city":"Warsaw","is_proxy":false}
    [2023-10-26 10:30:16] WARN: Suspected non-residential IP (ASN: CLOUDFLARENET) geolocated to residential area.
  • My Urgent Question: How can I more accurately detect and filter out VPN/proxy IP addresses from my geolocation API results? Are there specific services or techniques for more robust VPN detection to improve location accuracy by identifying these?
  • Closing: Anyone faced this before and found a reliable solution?

2 Answers

0
MD Alamgir Hossain Nahid
Answered 2 weeks ago
It appears your geolocation API is indeed struggling with the increasing prevalence of VPNs and proxies. The `is_proxy: false` flag from a standard API for an IP like 104.28.249.123 (a Cloudflare IP, as your log correctly identifies via ASN) is a clear indicator that basic geolocation services are not equipped for robust proxy detection. By the way, a quick grammar note: ensure you're using "I'm" with a capital 'I' for proper capitalization. The core issue is that standard IP geolocation services primarily map an IP address to a physical location based on network registration and routing. They don't inherently differentiate between a legitimate residential user and a user connecting through a VPN server hosted in a data center, which can then be anywhere in the world. To accurately detect and filter out VPN/proxy IP addresses, you need to leverage specialized IP fraud detection services that go beyond basic lookup. Hereโ€™s a more robust approach:
  • Integrate a Dedicated Proxy/VPN Detection Service: Instead of relying solely on your geolocation API's `is_proxy` flag, integrate a dedicated service designed specifically for this purpose. These services maintain extensive databases of proxy, VPN, TOR, and data center IP ranges, often incorporating real-time threat intelligence and behavioral analysis. Examples include IPQualityScore, FraudLabs Pro, or Proxycheck.io. They provide a more granular "proxy score" or a highly accurate `is_proxy` flag, often detailing the type of proxy (residential proxy, VPN, TOR, etc.).
  • Combine Data Sources: While these dedicated services are powerful, you can enhance accuracy by combining their output with your existing data. For instance, if a user IP is flagged by a proxy detection service AND its ASN belongs to a known cloud provider (like Cloudflare, AWS, Google Cloud), your confidence in it being a non-residential connection increases significantly.
  • Analyze Connection Type: Many advanced services also categorize the connection type (e.g., residential, mobile, business, hosting/data center). Prioritize filtering out IPs explicitly identified as 'hosting' or 'data center' if they are not expected.
  • Implement Dynamic Scoring: Instead of a hard blacklist, consider a dynamic scoring system. An IP with a high proxy score from a dedicated service, combined with a data center ASN, could trigger a higher confidence flag for filtering or further verification, rather than an outright block which might lead to false positives. This helps in more sophisticated bot detection and filtering.
This multi-layered approach will significantly improve your ability to distinguish between genuine residential users and those masking their location via proxies or VPNs, thereby cleaning up your analytics and targeting data. Hope this helps your conversions!
0
Amit Sharma
Answered 2 weeks ago

MD Alamgir Hossain Nahid, your advice on dedicated proxy detection services worked a charm tho, really helped clean things up!

Your Answer

You must Log In to post an answer and earn reputation.